DNA Database

Here is a very simple proposal.

From every baby born a tiny sample of DNA is taken that goes into a country wide database, with sharing agreements between countries. When a crime is committed it will make is easier to track down criminals.

Let's examine who could have any reason to object to this:

Criminals - D'uh of course they would not like such a system, they are after all criminals.
Spies - OK I can kind of see a point here, their names can be temporary removed from the larger database.
Privacy Advocates: see criminals above. Regular people should have nothing to fear from having their DNA on file what possible use could it be put to to give problems to regular, honest people.

If the data is misused, e.g. stolen and sold etc. all parties in the chain should receive automatic life sentences (real ones, e.g. not the Australian pretend versions).

Journalism and Reporters

The seas will rise by 50 meters, he can get a 20 year sentence, Diana may have been killed, My father was an alien.

These kinds of headlines, apart from that last checkout rag one, are becoming more and more common. As news watchers we are getting less and less actual news, a smaller number of stories and less and less information upon which to make any kind of reasoned opinion.

The process of journalism or the recording and presenting of facts and information has been replaced my marketing and the opinions of those who read the news or the magnates behind the talking heads.

News and reporting, for the most part, has become entertainment. In the examples above the missing information would be "as predicted by one climate modelling program," "that is the maximum rarely if ever applied," "or so one man wishes to be accepted in English society," and well that one might be possible in an alternate universe.

The result is individuals who are being pushed in a certain direction by a minority of people. Instead of getting the facts and making up our own minds we get only what others want us to get so the conclusions are forced.

You can do the research on your own and trace down the real facts but how many people actually do that, only a tiny percentage of the whole. The result is a pre-programmed society that believe what special interest groups want you to believe be it the number of deaths in Iraq or the effects of man made CO2 or which person is best to vote for in the next election.

Multiculturalism

Multiculturalism is a word that many people view as being more choices in restaurants and food types available at the local market.

In truth it is a university concept that has made its way out onto the real world with across the board disastrous results. Its implementation is taken to mean that all cultures in any given society are to be treated as equal no matter how many people in that cultural group.

It also means that the culture of the group is to be respected even if it is different from that of the main culture. Take Australia for example, police in Sydney have been told to ignore things that are illegal under Australian law in Muslim areas.

When people migrate they form clusters of their own people and will not integrate or accept the local laws, traditions or culture. As soon as numbers get large enough they will move in on top of the existing culture. Consider places like the Netherlands where this is starting to become a problem or Norway as examples.

Multiculturalism is a failed experiment. It does not work. The whole niceness approach just causes problems.

Political Correctness

If you go back to the late 1920's the then USSR commissioned a look into destabilising the Western World. The conclusions were that the basis for Western thought being steeped in the early European ideals of questioning, criticising, open thought and so on were just too hard to attack directly.

From this basis the idea was to try and attack these inherent freedoms within Western society but how?

Enter the concept of political correctness that was spread through the basics of socialism into those from the left and from there into universities through leftists lecturers and professors, and more recently from mainstream newspaper columnists.

What political correctness does is remove the freedom to criticise and question, the freedom to freely express ideas and thoughts. The USSR may be long gone but that process that started all those years ago has corrupted the basic freedoms that we used to enjoy.

Political correctness substitutes one label for another, one word of one meaning for another of exactly the same meaning (and usually intent) but in a weaker form. It gives rise to religious vilification legislation that ends up being a one-sided attack on the basic Christian Western white demographic and allows minority groups of different kinds to essentially control the majority.

PC encourages people to feel guilty about everything and to question their basic value set. The long term results could end up being the removal of the whole Western way of life albeit well after the intended target time.

Sydney Airport

Having been through a *lot* of airports in many countries the international airport in Sydney has got to be one of the worst ones. If you don't believe me then try this for example.

Arrive on a flight from Bangkok to connect a flight to Adelaide.
Go thorough Immigration and Customs.
Find out you have to check back into international and pass back through Immigration
Fly to your internal destination and go back through the Immigration and Customs area yet again.

Try the same thing in any other country on the planet.

Not much else to say really.

Condi Rice - Useless in the Middle East

One of the most naïve things ever done by Bush is to assign a female to deal with Muslims. It shows a complete lack of understanding of Islam and the Arabic States in general.

This has only been reinforced in recent months by the things that Rice says.

Fact: Islam teaches that non-Muslims are not to be listened to, that any treaty you sign with them can be broken and that women have less status than men and cannot do many job types.

When Rice talks all they hear is white noise and anything they agree to can be broken under Sharia law. Also under their law they cannot ever make peace with Israel unless all of their land is handed back.

It's the Sharia Law, get used to it.

Japanese Whaling

The current approach to Japanese whaling by governments (particularly that of Australia) and news services is poor. Here is how I would do it:

Opening shot: Protected whale and calf
Shot 2: The hunter ships harpooning a whale
Shot 3: The processing ship dragging it up the ramp
Shot 3A (if possible) the processing ship packing the meat.
Shot 4: The processed and packaged meat arriving at the Japanese wharf
Shot 5: The same package in the supermarket

Hammer this process from kill to supermarket until people stop listening to the "for research" line, i.e. expose the Japanese as liars.

Did you know that whale meat is handed out in Japanese schools to the childred to eat?